Where are the women fighting for reproductive rights?


If you haven’t listened to the Feminist Current podcast interviewing Civia Tamarkin about her documentary “Birthright: A War Story,” you should – especially if you live in the United States. The damage to reproductive rights that the Trump administration and their state government minions are inflicting on US women – and global women through international policy – is a continually developing tragedy. Here in Missouri the governor is in the midst of passing a law in which landlords can decline/ evict unmarried women who use birth control and get abortions. No word yet as to how this would be even be enforced.

So, during this interview, Tamarkin asks something that my mother asked about a month ago: where are all the women protesting these attacks on women’s reproductive freedom?

Tamarkin brought up an especially good point about college campuses. Generally a hub for social change, college campuses presently seem particularly…

View original post 906 more words


The problem with Owen Jones

I have a bone to pick with Owen Jones. In a recent article on online abuse, he wrote:

When I experienced this abuse in the past, I felt aggrieved, in the middle of a twitter storm, under attack, you name it. But here’s an important perspective and context to consider. The majority of trans people have contemplated suicide. A large majority suffer mental distress in a society absolutely riddled with transphobia. When prominent media commentators who describe themselves as progressive refuse to accept their right to exist, who intentionally and gratuitously misgender them, who joke about them looking like Pete Burns (as one of my trans women friends has been mocked by some of the detractors I’m referring to in this piece) — well, is anger understandable, even if the abuse is unsavoury? I put the abuse I’ve received in that context. They can’t do that, because they fundamentally oppose trans rights and portray supporters of trans rights as misogynists.

There are a few issues with this passage, not least the victim blaming. If women who reject and criticise trans ideology get “unsavoury” abuse, surely they deserve it? Play nice and you will be fine, right? What’s more, he relies on misrepresentations to support his claims. Women don’t refuse to accept the right of trans people to exist. We know they exist. What we refuse to accept is a narrative that insists that men can become women and vice versa, especially in the absence of coherent and objective definitions. Neither do we oppose trans rights. What we oppose is trans rights that come at the expense of women’s rights. This is something men on the left cannot accept: women should just put up and shut up. Which is why such men are rightly called misogynists. Owen is displaying either ignorance or disingenuity in his arguments, and it is tiresome to have to repeatedly defend ourselves against red herrings. But here goes anyway.

It is not transphobic, hateful or violent to state that humans can’t change sex. It is biologically impossible for someone born male to become female. I would argue that it is our duty to make this very clear so that people who are considering having surgery or taking hormones do so with full awareness. Some of these changes will be irreversible and all carry risks, as well as requiring a lifetime of follow ups. We need to listen to those who regret having surgery as well as those who benefited from it.

It is not transphobic, hateful or violent for women to defend our rights and point out that we are oppressed on the basis of our female biology. We view gender as a hierarchy that naturalises our subordination and men’s dominance, often through violent means. This is borne out by statistics: male violence against women is described as a pandemic by the UN. In this context, we have a right to male-free safe spaces and to demand that laws and policies not be based on self-declaration, since this would be wide open to abuse and put women at risk. As has happened in Target stores on several occasions (the last case involving voyeurism by a “transgender woman”), at the University of Toronto, and at shelters for women, for example. We argue that there is no such thing as female essence or female brain not because we want to deny others rights, but because such claims have been used throughout history to deny us rights. For women to fully participate in public life, it is necessary to acknowledge the nature of our oppression and the barriers that block our path to liberation. The “we just want to pee” argument masks what is at stake for women. The case of India, where communal bathrooms are common, shows the risks when women don’t have access to safe toilets: kidnapping and assaults occur regularly.

It is not transphobic, hateful or violent for lesbians to have boundaries that exclude MTTs (male-to-trans or “transwomen”). In fact, MTTs have no right to call themselves lesbians: lesbians are female homosexuals and MTTs are male. It is lesbophobic for male individuals to appropriate our orientation and to deny us our spaces and marches. Attempts to shame and coerce lesbians into having relationships with males is typical of rape culture and is conceptually indistinguishable from corrective rape. “I’m a lesbian trapped in a man’s body” used to be a “joke” but is now wholly supported by an ideology that dismisses same-sex attraction as bigoted.

It is not transphobic, hateful or violent to argue for caution in the case of dysphoric children. Gender dysphoria has many causes and transitioning is not the right treatment in many cases. The high level of desistance attests to this. Detransitioners have important stories to tell and deserve to be heard, too. Trauma, abuse and homophobia all play a part in dysphoria, and less radical procedures can greatly help in these cases. We also need to ask questions about social contagion, porn culture and misogyny when large numbers of girls suddenly claim to be trans. For their part, autistic children are overrepresented, which raises questions about the nature of their vulnerability and the need to protect them against harm. Overall, as things stand, guidelines for treatment are based on the experience of men who transitioned late in life. We need to hear from those who manage(d) their dysphoria without transitioning so that children get the best possible treatment and support.

It is not transphobic, hateful or violent to refuse to adopt a language, including pronouns, that validates a misogynistic and homophobic ideology. Women are referred to as non-men or more recently as non-prostate owners. Lesbians are cisbians and are getting banned from Facebook for using the word dyke. A vagina is a front hole, while a neo-vagina becomes a true vagina. The language deliberately erases women, lesbians and female biology, and allows further oppression to take place. On the other hand, the terminology referring to men and male biology is never questioned or redefined.

There is no doubt that trans people face discrimination and violence, and deserve legal protections. (As do women incidentally.) But this doesn’t give trans activists carte blanche to deny others their rights and to abuse, threaten and smear those who disagree with their ideology. In any case, Owen can’t have it both ways. If anger and “unsavoury” abuse are understandable, then women who receive death and rape threats as well as all other forms of misogynistic abuse would be well within their rights to retaliate in kind. This doesn’t happen however because such abuse is never acceptable.  For Owen to state otherwise, supporting his position with misrepresentations, only puts the spotlight back on the left’s acceptance of misogyny and its inability/unwillingness to tackle it.

Honor Frost

We have all heard stories of the lost city of Atlantis, or have marvelled at the possibility of exploring the sunken Titanic, but not many of us have heard of the name ‘Honor Frost’. Frost is responsible for helping the possibility of such adventures being realised (well, perhaps not the exploration of Atlantis) as a pioneer of deep-sea archaeology.

View original post 492 more words

This is how men will take advantage of transactivist identity politics.

treading on capes

What is not new, is that an event for women only has been shut down by men. An event for female game developers to host conferences and network has been shut down by men who have been made too intensely uncomfortable by the reality of women being independent beings seeking out and immersing themselves in some fun without them. When that hobby is something that is typically seen as a noble stick of masculine measurement, women going anywhere near it seems to be particularly infuriating, which is nice to see.

What is a little bit new, is the way these men are activating their seething, bubbling misogyny. They have been threatening to infiltrate the event as “female transexuals”. Clearly not in the least bit intimidated by the obsessive cult-like activism of transactivism and ‘queer’ politics, they have seem the new fashionable feminism as a key on a plate to get…

View original post 785 more words

The Chicago Dyke March is lesbophobic


Another day, another attack on lesbians from the queer community. There is nothing new in this Tweet from Chicago Dyke March. It is part of a long line of attempts by so-called progressives to deny material reality and shame any lesbian who refuses to suspend disbelief. In truth, it only serves to highlight how the horseshoe theory applies to lesbophobia: whether on the right or the left, a woman whose sexuality excludes penis is seen as an aberration, someone who must be shamed and attacked for having boundaries that excludes males. It is a very old problem for us.

In the wake of post-modernism and queer theory, we find ourselves in a world where words have been stripped of any meaning. A woman is anyone who feels like a woman, and a lesbian is any who is attracted to women only. This translates into men being allowed to claim that their penis is female and that they are lesbians. What we are seeing is words with no objective meaning being used to erase lesbianism in favour of straight men who have always resented us for our independence.

The point that it is lesbianism under attack cannot be overemphasised: it is mostly lesbians who are the target of such abuse when the “logic” behind queer theory should apply equally to gay men and straight people. Yet there are hardly any articles asking whether male homosexuality is becoming obsolete, or whether straight men should start labelling themselves queer so as to not be exclusionary. Lesbians, on the other hand, can choose from an abundance of such articles and are constantly targeted for abuse and attacks if they dare speak up.

It is worth remembering that the alleged purpose of a Dyke March is to raise lesbian visibility. Yet it is clear that in the case of the Chicago Dyke March, as well as other Dyke Marches, lesbian erasure is actively supported while men in dresses are celebrated. I guess we are seeing the post-modern definition of inclusivity in action: the word lesbian now includes everyone but actual lesbians.

What is being asked of us, effectively, is that we change our orientation and that we dismiss our boundaries. According to queers, female same-sex attraction no longer exists since the material reality of sex is considered to be a social construct. In its place we find the nebulous concept of gender with its circular logic and reliance on sex-based stereotypes. The end result is that sex is not sexed while brains and “essence” are. This only illustrates the incoherence and absurdity of post-modern queer theory, which insists that there are no objective truths whilst relying heavily on the “objective truth” of gender in order to deconstruct it. And lesbians, as well as women in general, are paying the price for this nonsense.

The Chicago “Dyke” March is just an offshoot of patriarchy. It demands that lesbians erase themselves from their own lives in order to prop up the subjective identities of men. A refusal to comply is met with the usual punishment meted out to outspoken women. But we are going nowhere, and we are not shutting up.

Capitalism, Legalized Prostitution, and the Plight of Romanian Women: A Case Study in Sexual Exploitation

Great post, and a quote that sums up the issue of the legalisation of prostitution very well: “Legal prostitution in other countries creates the opportunity for crime everywhere.”


I was listening to a feminist podcast on the subject unrelated to labor and sexual exploitation when, during the brief rundown of news at the beginning of the program, I learned that migrant Romanian women working in agriculture in Sicily were being horribly sexually exploited by their employers. Now, sexual exploitation of women within capitalism is not news to me, but this particularly situation struck me as outside the general narrative of the global North exploiting the global South. It also raised issues regarding legalized prostitution Europe, so I feel it is a situation worth highlighting.

Sicilian police believe there are about 7,500 women, the majority of whom are Romanian, living in slave conditions on farms across Sicily, but particularly in the region of Ragusa. According to the Proxyma Association, an Italian migrant rights organization, an estimated half of all Romanian women are regurlaly raped by their employers. If they…

View original post 707 more words

Girl Gets misgendered and mis-sexed as boy and banned from soccer tournament because of typo and short hair; Abby Wambach defends her


“Mili Hernandez adores soccer…but last weekend, Hernandez’s entire team was disqualified from a soccer tournament in Springfield, Nebraska because organizers were certain that she was a boy. Their proof? Hernandez has a short hair cut.”

Yep, this happened. Poor Mili was misgendered and mis-sexed because of a typo on the registrar listing her as a boy. Her parents apparently provided their child’s insurance card that listed her sex as female, but the league still banned the entire team.

“Just because I look like a boy doesn’t mean I am a boy,” stated a devasted Mili after being in shock and crying.

Guess what hurts as much as being misgendered when you are trans? Being mis-sexed from your ACTUAL sex. Maybe the trans lobby isn’t aware of this incident, but so far there has been no outrage over this migendering from the trans police.

There was one very important response, however…

View original post 561 more words

For a woman with internalized homophobia

Much better response than Mary’s. For lesbians, dating teenage boys/men was never fun since there was never a spark. Highlights the problem when heterosexuality is the default and only valid sexuality.

Purple Sage

The Independent published a “Dear Mary” column in which a woman in love with her female friend asked for advice. Mary gave her very poor advice, which is why I am stepping in.

The reader asked the following:

“I think that I am in love with my best friend who is also a girl. I do not know if the term is really in love at all, because up until now I’ve never ever had a romantic relationship. My status is NBSB – no boyfriend since birth. I just really believe that true love waits, so am not in a rush. I’m a 24-year-old professional whose career is going strong, I have a wonderful family, I serve the Lord every Sunday and I only have very selected friends.

My friend and I went to the same university and took the same degree course. During our college years, I developed…

View original post 1,787 more words